Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id QAA11852 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 16:05:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA222777774; Mon, 25 Mar 1996 13:02:54 -0800
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 13:02:54 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199603252006.PAA13368@norden1.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Tim Krego <tkrego@norden1.com>
To: lightwave@e55.webcom.com
Subject: Re: Parity or Non Parity?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
At 02:38 PM 3/25/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Parity RAM allows your machine to detect and correct any random bit switches
>that may occur. I would advise that you get it -it's well worth the extra
>cost....
I disagree with that. Parity errors are so rare it isn't worth the extra
money to me personally. Others may not be able to sleep at night without